August 1st, 2025 | RYAN TYLER

Why You Need To Become A Free Speech Hardliner

We'll lose the war if we don't fight it.

If there was ever a time to unapologetically defend free speech in Canada, that time is now. We've seen how they fight, now it's time for us to return the fire. Everyone who thinks free speech is under threat will need to become a hardliner. That means making sacrifices and taking a stand against anyone who attempts to redefine the meaning of free speech and public discourse. It's time for you to become a hardliner.

Recently, the mayor of Montreal released one of the most ludicrous statements I have ever read about free speech. However, it exhibits the mentality of the mobs who attempt to use “hate” as a means to justify shutting down speech they don't like:

“Freedom of expression is one of our fundamental values, but hateful and discriminatory speech is not accepted in Montreal and, as in other Canadian cities, the show will not be tolerated.”

She, of course, was referring to a concert by Sean Feucht—a musician described by legacy media as pro-MAGA. After venues began revoking his bids to perform, and cancelling his shows following a deliberate campaign by media, a church in Montreal provided him an alternative venue. When word spread, the city of Montreal was quick to send in police under the pretense that the proper permits were not obtained.

Whether the city of Montreal actually requires permits for churches to hold concerts, or not, doesn't really matter. It doesn't matter because any permits would have been declined anyhow. At the same time, the city of Vaughan denied Feucht's permit on the grounds that his show could cause disruptions and attract protests.

Strangely, various events and concerts that have attracted disruptions and protests have been given the greenlight in places like Vaughan and Montreal. But, we already knew that. We already know that these denials and cancellations have everything to do with ideology and politics.

Whether you agree with MAGA or Sean Feucht shouldn't matter. Denying permits and cancelling pre-booked concerts due to the political opinions of the musicians is wrong in any country built on the foundation of free speech and expression. Secondly, calling his ideology hateful is dishonest.

While we allow pro-Hamas protesters to invade our streets, shutting down a musician that preaches traditional Christian values and sometimes speaks out against abortion makes even less sense. Letting literal terrorist sympathizers protest and block traffic cannot continue to be justified while low-profile musicians get shut down for being pro-life and pro-MAGA. All of this bullshit needs to stop. The only reason it happens is because most Canadians are either weak, or truly against speech they don't agree with.

Let's be honest. Many Canadians have no problem at all with silencing people they disagree with. We've seen it with our own eyes. The average, normal, media-crazed Canadian prefers shutting down speech they have been told might be “dangerous” to their way of life, or speech that might cause others to turn against their own beliefs. The “dangerous” and “hateful” labels are strategically applied by journalists to headlines and stories about anything the Liberal establishment deems as such.

Like mindless parasites, normal Canadians eat it up.

It is, after all, easier to believe everything media and self-proclaimed experts say. Rather than think, research, and critically analyze the information they are given, most Canadians would prefer to turn off the most important parts of their brain to focus on menial, trivial things like hockey and donuts. It takes far too much effort to do anything else. Canadians choose to be dumb and gullible because it is easy.

As a person who strongly believes in freedom of expression, it is your duty to defend it. Unlike them, you are not choosing to be dumb. If you've made it this far reading this, you are most definitely pissed off and serious about freedom. You're very aware of the dangers that come with letting freedom and speech slip through our fingers. You know history.

So, let's start being hardliners.

Defining Hate Speech

Any libertarian or conservative knows there is no such thing as hate speech when it comes to free speech. Yes, speech can be hateful, but that does not make it illegal. By law, only speech that directly encourages violence is illegal. Peaceful (but honest) speech that certain people disagree with is most definitely not hate speech.

Here come the mobs with their “Canada does not have a First Amendment” arguments.

How often have you heard them say Canada is not the United States and that we do not tolerate hateful speech? It is partially true, in the sense that Liberal governments have tried to implement legislation to limit free speech by adding clauses about “hateful” rhetoric. However, hate is a very subjective term. Most lawyers and judges have acknowledged that, in the court of law, most hate speech laws do not stand up. This is why few people are ever prosecuted under Canada's current “hate speech” laws.

The clearest definition of hate speech, at the moment, is direct and blatant speech that targets people based on their identity. It is obvious speech that deliberately encourages hatred against certain races, cultures, ethnicities and genders—without any deniability about how obvious and blatant it is. That, of course, rarely happens in Canada.

The speech they are going after when they label it hateful is speech they don't like. It's speech they feel threatened by. To them, it is hateful because it may not tolerate their own worldviews in the same ways their friends and inner circles tolerate it. It is speech that challenges their perceptions of reality and threatens to wake up their friends and inner circles.

Those who incorrectly label things as hateful are doing so to protect their own ideas and perceptions—which are built on very shaky, unstable ground. They know this, which is why they feel so threatened.

Take the gender cult for instance. To them, so much as questioning the biology and science behind their ideological perceptions is considered hateful and bigotted. If they say that men can menstruate and bear children, we are supposed to follow along and refrain from asking questions. It is the only way their perceptions can survive in the battlefield of public opinion. Under scrutiny, in a truly free environment, their ideas would lose and a majority of the public would disagree with them.

The same is true for everyone who attacks controversial or subversive speech as hateful.

Much of this, when it comes from the political class or Liberals, is strategic and purposeful. They are deliberately labelling certain ideas and speech as hateful to protect their ideological grip on a majority of Canadians. The rest of their miserable followers are brainwashed and will parrot and repeat the Liberal slogans they hear in media. If a headline calls a musician hateful, then he is hateful and should be banned.

Because hate speech laws are rarely broken and poorly defined, many ideological liberals will simply try to enforce their ideology using any available means, like denying permits to performers they disagree with. Liberal journalists will whip up frenzies with headlines and stories deeming certain people as hateful and bigotted, causing groundswells of panic and hysteria inside of a community. If they can't prosecute their political enemies in the court of law, they will use whatever power they have to silence them in other ways.

Others will often try to define threatening questions as targetted attacks against a specific identity, usually failing to successfully invoke existing hate speech laws.

If we don't begin to unapologetically stand up for free and honest speech, these people will eventually get their flimsy ideas about hate written into legislation and implemented into law. They will try to define hate speech in more specific ways. It wouldn't be easy on their part, but we shouldn't assume they can't succeed. This is, after all, a clown country. We have seen what has happened in other clown countries like the UK.

How To Fight Back

We don't encourage violence. We don't unfairly target people based on race, sex, or ethnicity in hateful ways. However, we have to leave room for honesty. We know certain cultures are not equal or compatible. We know biological men can't get pregnant. We know men and women are better at some things more than others. We know what we know and we should not feel ashamed for talking about it. This doesn't mean we should attack an entire race or group based on the actions of a few, it just means we are allowed to ask questions and make observations.

Questions are the backbone of free speech and logic.

When we talk about immigration, we don't need to attack and smear an entire culture. Personally, I know more pleasant and friendly non-white immigrants than I do native Canadians. I have said this often and have no qualms about it. White Canadians are generally arrogant, entitled, unpleasant people. Above all, most of them are brainwashed idiots and I know more immigrants I would rather be friends with. However, I know that more people have been killed in the past few years in Canada by Indian truck drivers than by white truckers.

Oops. Is that racist? No. It's an observation I typed out for you to read.

In a free and open society where people are allowed to honestly debate topics, my observation can be disproven, discreditted and disavowed by anyone. That's the real kicker. That's the part that scares people. It's not the idea that I could be proven wrong that scares anyone, it's the idea that I might be right.

It is only when we tap into something that becomes difficult to deny that they become wary of free speech. When some of us began questioning excess immigration two years ago, accusations of racism began to swirl. How dare anyone attack immigrants, they said. It was racist to question the Trudeau government's historic open borders scheme. They said we were attacking immigrants, when all we were doing was asking questions. Fast forward to 2025 and Mark Carney is scaling back immigration while big banks and economists warn us about the negative consequences of excess immigration on housing and healthcare.

This reality check was accomplished by pointing out undeniable facts and asking important questions.

It's important to note that while fringe conservatives and real bigots were online ten years ago, complaining about brown people and muslims, nothing happened. It had no effect. The immigration argument was being lost by a few morons who reverted to slander and real hatred. It was won later by real facts and honest questions. But, mostly, it was won by the real consequences of mass immigration—which became undeniable and blatantly obvious to most Canadians.

At the moment, media and politcians are playing twister with the facts about immigrant truckers, but as we continue to point to reality and ask real questions, the truth will prevail and more lives will be saved.

It is becoming more clear that honest questions and debates have stifled the transgender movement's influence over ordinary Canadians. Just over the past year, we have seen fewer attempts to drill this ideology into the heads of children and normal people. This year's pride month was barely on the radar for media and most corporations. Many didn't even bother to acknowledge it at all. The aggressive attempts to normalize gender swaps and certain sexual orientations were noteably more absent in 2025, albeit not entirely gone.

Simple, frequent, honest questions always win. Now, we just need to become more bold and unapologetic.